Wednesday, September 28, 2005

All's Fair in Love and Lies

''Sex, Love & Secrets'' premiered on UPN last night. For some reason I just can't get that right. I keep calling it ''Sex, Lies & Secrets'' instead. By the end of the series though, ''Lies'' may be more appropriate than ''Love'' anyways.

I'm always amazed at how some movies permeate pop culture. Take ''sex, lies, and videotape" for example. The movie was released in theatres on August 4, 1989. Before the movie was released, no TV eps were named ''Sex, Lies and ____.'' Less than four months after the movie was released, ''Who's the Boss?'' named an ep after the movie. And now at least 30 series have an ep title based on the movie name.

Here are some of the more creative ways TV writers ended the statement, ''Sex, Lies and _____,'' for ep titles.

  • Sex, Lies and 35mm Slides (''FM,'' 6/9/1990)
  • Sex, Lies and a Truckload of Dates (''Street Time,'' 4/30/2003)
  • Sex, Lies and Adhesive Tape (''Medicine Ball,'' 4/24/1995)
  • Sex, Lies and Bad Hair Days (''Designing Women,'' 3/5/1993)
  • Sex, Lies and Books (''Girlfriends,'' 2/17/2003)
  • Sex, Lies and Cable TV (''Grand,'' 2/1/1990)
  • Sex, Lies and Ed's Tapes (''Northern Exposure,'' 8/16/1990)
  • Sex, Lies and Exercise Tape (''Who's the Boss?,'' 11/21/1989)
  • Sex, Lies and Larvae (''CSI: Crime Scene Investigation,'' 12/22/2000)
  • Sex, Lies and Lullabies (''Sweating Bullets,'' 11/4/1991)
  • Sex, Lies and Monkeys (''The Practice,'' 10/18/1997)
  • Sex, Lies and Popcorn (''Thunder Alley,'' 10/26/1994)
  • Sex, Lies and Second Thoughts (''Ally McBeal,'' 10/23/2000)
  • Sex, Lies and Shining Armor (''Sweet Justice,'' 10/22/1994)
  • Sex, Lies and Teenagers (''Blossom,'' 2/4/1991)
  • Sex, Lies and Tortillas (''The Golden Palace,'' 5/7/1993)
  • Sex, Lies and Video Date (''Spin City,'' 3/12/2002)
  • Sex, Lies and Volleyball (''Beverly Hills, 90210,'' 8/5/1992)
  • Sex, Lies and Yellow Tape (''Silk Stalkings,'' 10/31/1993)
  • Tuesday, September 27, 2005

    Better the Actor You Know Than the Name That You Don't

    Donald James Yarmy died late Sunday.

    Who?

    Would you believe...Don Adams is one of the many actors and actresses who changed last names for the screen and stage. Many actors took new identities for personal, political, artistic or business reasons. Other actors heard SAG say, "Sorry about that, chief!" and were forced to change names since each Guild member must have a unique name.

    What other TV actors and actresses changed their last names for their craft? Match the performer's screen name (left column) with his/her birth surname (right column):


    Performer's Screen NamePerformer's Birth Surname
    1.Jason Alexandera.Ball
    2.Lynda Carterb.Baumgarner
    3.Emma Caulfieldc.Brown
    4.Angie Dickinsond.Chukker
    5.Barbara Edene.Cordoba
    6.Sally Fieldf.Cox
    7.James Garnerg.Douglas
    8.Kathie Lee Giffordh.Epstein
    9.Cheryl Laddi.Greenspan
    10.Michael Keatonj.Huffman
    11.Bernie Mack.Mahoney
    12.Joan Riversl.McCollough
    13.Dick Sargentm.Molinksy
    14.Lindsay Wagnern.Stoppelmoor

    (+/-)answers



    sources: rottentomatoes.com, wikipedia stage names.

    Monday, September 26, 2005

    Two and Through

    If a network cancels a series and nobody cares, did the series ever exist?

    ''Head Cases'' is the first casualty of the season. Fox cancelled this awful series a week earlier than I expected, causing me to rearrange my posting schedule. Today I'm going to introduce ''The TV Shorty List,'' introduce other TV series that only aired twice, and update a few features for ''TV Shorty Watch.'' If you clicked looking for ''TV Power Ratings, Part Deux'' today, that blog entry has been pre-empted to bring you this more timely entry.

    First, the new features for ''TV Shorty Watch.''
  • A series that is cancelled while on Shorty Watch will remain on the list with strikethrough text. That skein will immediately be added to ''The TV Shorty List.''
  • Shows that are on hiatus, but not yet cancelled, will appear in bold italicized text. No network has officially placed a show on hiatus yet, but I can just feel it. Can't you?
  • Expandable lists. I've added ''The TV Shorty List'' to the near right column today. I'll soon be adding ''Power Ratings'' to the near right column as well. It just makes sense to conserve some space in that column and use expandable lists for all features.

    ''The TV Shorty List'' presents TV Shorties in three groups, based on number of airings. Remember, a TV Shorty is any series that the network intended to show at least four times but aired three or fewer times.

    Why is it important that the network intended to show the series at least four times? Two-part specials and two-part movies are not TV Shorties. If a presentation only has two parts and both parts air, then that show has run its course. It's not really short-lived at all. The show had a short life, but it was a full life.

    The main purpose of ''The TV Shorty List'' is simple. The list celebrates successful failure. Every show on this list was picked up by a network to be a series and aired at least one time, and we know how difficult it is to reach that milestone. In this sense, all TV Shorties were wildly successful. But these shows did fail to meet expectations since they were cancelled before they could complete their full run.

    Fox aired two eps of ''Head Cases'' and has four more eps in the can. We can officially welcome ''Head Cases'' to the party, joining the other series that were Two and Through:

  • ''AFP: American Fighter Pilot'' (CBS, 2002)
  • ''Aliens in the Family'' (ABC, 1996)
  • ''America.01'' (ABC, 2001)
  • ''Apple Pie'' (ABC, 1978)
  • ''Big Shamus, Little Shamus'' (CBS, 1979)
  • ''Charlie Lawrence'' (CBS, 2003)
  • ''Clerks'' (ABC, 2000)
  • ''Confessions'' (CourtTV, 2000)
  • ''Danny'' (CBS, 2001)
  • ''ElimiDATE Deluxe'' (WB, 2001)
  • ''The Fifth Corner'' (NBC, 1992)
  • ''Four Corners'' (CBS, 1998)
  • ''girls club'' (Fox, 2002)
  • ''Guess Again'' (CBS, 1951)
  • ''Imagine That'' (NBC, 2002)
  • ''Joey Faye's Frolics'' (CBS, 1950)
  • ''Love and Marriage'' (Fox, 1996)
  • ''The Mike O'Malley Show'' (NBC, 1999)
  • ''My Guys'' (CBS, 1996)
  • ''The Paula Poundstone Show'' (ABC, 1993)
  • ''Prince Street'' (NBC, 1997)
  • ''The Princes of Malibu'' (Fox, 2005)
  • ''The Real Roseanne Show'' (ABC, 2003)
  • ''Roxie'' (CBS, 1987)
  • ''Ryan Caulfield: Year One'' (Fox, 1999)
  • ''Sammy'' (NBC, 2000)
  • ''Sleepwalkers'' (NBC, 1997)
  • ''Sunset Beat'' (ABC, 1990)
  • ''Tag the Gag'' (NBC, 1951)
  • ''Take Five'' (CBS, 1987)
  • ''That Was Then'' (ABC, 2002)
  • ''Wind on Water'' (NBC, 1998)
  • ''Wonderland'' (ABC, 2000)
  • ''You’re the One'' (WB, 1998)
  • Friday, September 23, 2005

    Never Say Die...Unless a Survey Kills You

    When I watched the season premiere of ''Lost'' on Wednesday, I remembered an internet survey I took last year.

    Sometime in November 2004 or so, I took a survey about ''Lost.'' It was actually pretty detailed. The survey asked you to match pictures of 10-12 main characters with their names to see how well you knew them. Then the survey asked a series of questions about each character. Multiple choice questions like ''How much would you miss this character if he/she was no longer on the show?'' And questions like ''How much do you like this character?'' The survey pretty much asked the same question in four or five different ways.

    What was the purpose of the survey? Apparently, the producers wanted to know about fan reaction. I don't know if the producers planned on killing off Boone and wanted to determine how outraged the show's early fans might be. Or if they used the survey results to decide which character to kill off. I really skewed my answers and left no doubt that I'd miss every other character but Boone. At the time I kind of laughed the whole thing off--like Hollywood would actually kill off one of these characters. Needless to say, I was happy (in a warped way) that Boone died. But I still feel at least partly responsible for killing him off.

    If the ''Lost'' producers used the survey results at all, might this usher in a new technological era that uses the feedback from the masses instead of a focus group? Might producers actually check for fan outrage or wild approval for some major storylines by using surveys delivered to your TV immediately after a show? Will networks allow viewers to complete a survey and then watch an episode without commercials? Will you have a small dial on your remote so you can register your approval or disapproval in real-time while watching TV?

    Shows are relying more and more on word of mouth and blog reviews, which means they can't piss off the avid fan too much. If these fans are really miffed, the world will know quickly, the bad PR may spin out of control, and viewership may quickly drop off. It will be interesting to watch how technology-enabled, massive viewer feedback affects storylines in the near future.

    I would love to know what would've happened to ''Dallas'' after the famous dream episode if today's technology was available at the time. Would viewers have fled the show even faster? Or would SciFi viewers have been attracted to the show because of the plot twist?

    Thursday, September 22, 2005

    FOD for Thought

    If you ever visit the Poipu Beach area in Kauai and watch digital cable (Oceanic Time Warner), you'll find something that might intrigue you. But trust me. It will only disappoint--at least on that island.

    While I was flipping through the on-screen channel guide one late night last week, I came across the "Pizza on Demand" Channel at the end of the 900 channels.

    My first thought? Brilliant! Not only could restaurants take web orders, but now pizza places were taking DTV orders. Food-on-Demand (FOD), if you will.

    Think about the possibilities. You can see the list of toppings and crusts on your TV screen. Specials can change on the fly, based on time of day and recently viewed shows. Quick questions to test new product concepts. The system automatically routes your order to the closest location. No yellow pages. No maps to figure out which pizzeria might actually deliver to your area. No phone calls. No more questions like "Do you have bacon as a topping?" Just tell your TV what you want and your food arrives ~30 minutes later on your doorstep.

    Before I selected the channel I was already imagining other possibilities. After you order your pizza using the on-screen menus, you then have the opportunity to order a VOD movie at a reduced rate. The movies are not listed in random order--movie companies bid on movie placement just like GoogleAds. If Pizza Hut has a tie-in with a movie, you can rent that movie at a deep discount. The possibilities seemed endless. I was excited, and I didn't even want pizza. How pathetic is that?

    The reality? Brutal. When I selected the "Pizza on Demand" Channel, a green box appeared with the phone number for Pizza Hut. I guess the feature eliminated my need for a phone book and map, but I was very disappointed based on my visions of pizza delivery grandeur.

    Since I was so disappointed, I did a little bit of research after I came back from vacation.

    Turns out that I was on the wrong island. You can order your pizza on TV if you're on Oahu, where you've been able to place t-commerce (TV commerce) pizza orders for about five years. Five years! How come I haven't heard about this before? This feature is not available on Kauai, which isn't surprising since you can't even place an online order at Pizza Hut from the Poipu Beach area.

    According to an article by Jonathan Blum in Technology Investor (Sep 2000),
    In early VOD installations, like Time Warner’s Oceanic Cable in Hawaii, Pizza Hut does a bang-up business from set-top box orders prompted by ads accompanying VOD movies.

    “Set-top box ordering encourages viewers not only to order, but to order more,” says Robert Montgomery, president of Prasara Systems, the VOD software enabler who did the programming for the Hawaii install. “Selling-up high value pizza toppings and sodas is much easier with a set-top box than on the phone.”


    Here's more from an article by Steve Donohue in Multichannel News (5/3/2004)
    Oceanic uses Navic to add interactive overlays to commercials from Pizza Hut and other advertisers. Customers that click on an overlay on the bottom of the screen are switched to channel 999, where they can choose from a variety of pizzas and toppings. Oceanic - now collecting 500 to 600 pizza orders per week - has found subscribers spend more money on a pizza when they buy it through the television than when they call in an order over the telephone. "There's an interesting phenomenon," Smith said.

    He said the average Pizza Hut order in Hawaii taken over the phone costs $16, while orders taken through the television run about $24. A typical phone order might be for a large pizza with one topping. But customers tend to add more toppings when they have a wide menu of options on their television to choose from, Smith said.
    "That just shows you the power of visually being able to feel these various options -people order more," he said.

    Oceanic, which collects a fee from Pizza Hut for every order it processes, is looking to expand in the next few months to a full food court that will offer subscribers takeout or home delivery from a wide variety of restaurants, Smith said. The cable system will also launch a TV-based "shopping mall" later this year that will allow digital customers to order compact discs and other retail products with the click of a remote, according to Smith.

    Time Warner recently expanded the channel capacity on its decoders in Hawaii from 999 to 1,999 channels, using many of the new channels to house longform video-on-demand ads. For example, when it runs local ads for Mercedes-Benz automobiles, customers who want more information can click on an interactive overlay that takes them to a channel where they can take a car out for a "virtual test drive." Oceanic's Channel 912 houses video classifieds. Subscribers can view help wanted ads from employers. A local real estate company that buys 30-second spots on Oceanic uses another channel on the system to offer listings of available homes and virtual home tours. Subscribers click on interactive overlays that run within the ads.


    Disclaimer: I am not affiliated with Pizza Hut, Time-Warner nor any other company presented in this entry. No compensation. No advertising. Nothing. I have eaten Pizza Hut pizza in the past, but I have not had their pizza in years. (I'm including this disclaimer only because I happened to write about Pizza Hut twice in three weeks. I know that if I was a frequent reader, then I might be suspicious.)

    Wednesday, September 21, 2005

    There's More Than One Way to Skin a Dot-Com

    ''E-Ring'' premieres on NBC tonight. I think it's going to fail simply because of its name.

    What is E-Ring? Is it a ringtone for Skype? An IM alert? A electronic terrorism ring?

    Nope. None of these.

    Maybe you're better informed than I was when I first heard the name. Maybe you knew that the E-Ring is the outermost ring of the Pentagon. I sure didn't. It turns out that the Pentagon has "five concentric pentagons of corridors and offices, with the designation of 'rings' and labeled A through E."

    Why didn't NBC first call the series ''The Pentagon E-Ring'' and then later shorten the name to ''E-Ring?'' At least the longer name would put E-Ring in context. Maybe even give people a reason to watch. It's a pretty cluttered TV world, and I just don't see ''E-Ring'' catching the attention of potential viewers. Geez, even CBS started with ''Navy N.C.I.S.'' to differentiate it from ''C.S.I.'' while keeping its ties to ''J.A.G.'' Once the series found an audience, CBS shortened the name to ''N.C.I.S.'' for the second season.

    Since I originally guessed that ''E-Ring'' related to the internet in some way, I looked for ep titles that reference the web. Can you name any eps with ''.com'' in the title?

  • digital underground.com (''New York Undercover,'' 9/28/1995)
  • callme@murder.com (''Silk Stalkings,'' 2/9/1997)
  • Homicide.com (''Homicide Life on the Street,'' 2/5/1999)
  • Eye-See-You.com (''The Net,'' 3/27/1999)
  • Parker.com (''Seven Days,'' 10/13/1999)
  • TrustMom.com (''Oh Baby,'' 1/29/2000)
  • Dot.Coms Are Human, Too (''Oh Baby,'' 3/11/2000)
  • Swap.com (''Even Stevens,'' 6/17/2000)
  • PMS.com (''Beggars and Choosers,'' 6/27/2000)
  • DrRichardKimble.com (''The Fugitive,'' 11/3/2000)
  • I'll Do It My Dammy.com (''The Jamie Foxx Show,'' 11/5/2000)
  • Matt&Sarah.at.Gossip.com (''Raising Dad,'' 1/11/2002)
  • Murder.com (''The Division,'' 2/2/2003)
  • Sex, Lies and expedia.com (''Judging Amy,'' 5/18/2004)
  • Tuesday, September 20, 2005

    A TV Show Marches on Its Working Title

    You may have watched the season premiere of ''Las Vegas'' last night, but did you know that ''Las Vegas'' was originally called ''Casino Eye?'' I had no idea until I added many working titles to my database on Sunday.

    I especially like the working title I entered just before ''Casino Eye.'' ''The Untitled Foster Project.'' Doesn't quite roll of the tongue like ''The Princes of Malibu,'' does it? But every series has to start with a working title.

    And a working title is critical. How do you hire actors and writers without one? Do you ask a writer, "Why don't you come work on this thing with me?" But which thing is it? Fortunately, working titles don't have to live forever. The concept and actors can grow and a new buzz-worthy name is created before the premiere.

    Most often the working title doesn't change that much. It might lose an exclamation point (''Bette!'' became ''Bette''), change a letter (''Numbers'' became ''Numb3rs''), shorten (''That's My Rodney'' became "Rodney''), or lengthen (''A Few Simple Rules'' became ''8 Simple Rules for Dating My Teenage Daughter'').

    But sometimes the title completely changes. ''Community Center'' first became ''American Wreck'' and then became ''Danny.''

    Some people might even say that working titles are prophetic. ''Danny'' was truly an ''American Wreck.'' ''Chest Pains'' became ''Royal Family'' and then Red Foxx died of a heart attack shortly after the series premiered. Coincidence? Or prophecy?

    Match each series (left) with its working title (right).



    Series NameWorking Title
    1.''According to Jim''a.''23:12''
    2.''Diff'rent Strokes''b.''45 Minutes from Harlem''
    3.''Eve''c.''All My Life''
    4.''Happy Days''d.''Crossroads''
    5.''Jesse''e.''The Dad''
    6.''The John Larroquette Show''f.''Family Business''
    7.''Leave It to Beaver''g.''Family Planning''
    8.''Married with Children''h.''It's a Small World''
    9.''The Partridge Family''i.''New Family in Town''
    10.''Reba''j.''Not the Cosbys''
    11.''That '70s Show''k.''The Opposite Sex''
    12.''Watching Ellie''l.''Teenage Wasteland''

    (+/-)answers

    Monday, September 19, 2005

    TV Power Ratings

    I'll present Power Ratings in two parts--one part today and the final part next Monday. By splitting the topic into two parts, I can provide a bit more detail for those who are interested.

    What's a Power Rating? And how is it different from a Nielsen rating?

    For the uninitiated, a Nielsen rating is the percentage of TV households tuned to a particular program. Nielsen Media Research estimated that there were ~110 million TV households in the United States during the 2004-2005 TV season. If 11.0 million TV households watched a show last year, then that show received a 10.0 rating since 11 million is 10.0% of 110 million.

    A Nielsen rating just tells you how many TV households watched. That rating tells you nothing about a show's power. Nothing about whether that show can:
      1. entice a household to watch a network it normally doesn't watch.
      2. increase audience size on a night when people usually keep the TV off.
      3. attract more households than the shows that precede and/or follow it.

    The essence of the Power Rating is simple. It measures a show's power to change viewing habits (and the show's importance to the network). Not all 10.0 ratings are created equal. I'll use Nielsen Ratings to calculate values for the qualities listed above.

    Today I'll briefly discuss how I quantify a show's ability to entice households to watch a network they normally don't watch. I'll finish with two lists of results. The numbers in these lists are not the Power Ratings for these shows, but the numbers are a good start.

    You really want to know "How large was the audience for one show relative to all other shows on the same network?" To do this comparison, you have to correct for the week the show aired. A 10.0 rating in the summer is very different than 10.0 rating during Fall sweeps month. If you want to read the mathematical description, you should expand the section below.

    (+/-)Click here to read the details


    A positive number means the show had a larger than average audience for that network. A negative number means the show a smaller than average audience for that network. The larger the number, the larger the difference between the show's average value and the network's average value.

    From the start of the 2004 TV season through Aug 7, 2005, which series had the largest rating relative to other shows on the same network?

    Here are the top ten series:
    2.24 ''American Idol''
    2.14 ''Dancing with the Stars''
    2.06 ''WWE Smackdown''
    1.89 ''Monday Night Football''
    1.85 ''So You Think You Can Dance''
    1.58 ''CSI''
    1.46 ''Brat Camp''
    1.32 ''Desperate Housewives''
    1.25 ''7th Heaven''
    1.19 ''ER''

    Who woulda thunk that ''Dancing with the Stars'' dominated ABC's summer schedule almost as much as ''American Idol'' dominated Fox's schedule earlier this year. And that number for ''Dancing with the Stars'' even includes a few low-rated repeat eps! I now understand, but don't approve, why ''Skating with Celebrities'' is being filmed.

    Here are the bottom ten series:
    -1.49 ''SI Swimsuit Model Search''
    -1.48 ''The Will''
    -1.35 ''BMOC: Big Man on Campus''
    -1.30 ''Last Comic Standing''
    -1.29 ''life as we know it''
    -1.27 ''Wickedly Perfect''
    -1.26 ''Complex Malibu''
    -1.17 ''The Mountain''
    -1.11 ''The Benefactor''
    -1.07 ''The Cut'' (not including the last four airings)

    No surprises there. It's interesting to note that ''Scrubs'' had the lowest value (-0.92) for a returning series. It's also interesting to note that no UPN series are listed--no single series flopped badly compared to their other shows.

    Friday, September 16, 2005

    Many Emmy Roads Lead to Rome...Eventually

    While watching ''Rome'' on Sunday, I thought back to the early '90s, specifically when ''Sunday Best'' premiered on NBC in 1991. (Don't remember ''Sunday Best?'' I'm not surprised. It's a Shorty. NBC aired three eps of the series in February 1991.) At that time, Sunday TV was pretty uninspiring. Just movies and Fox sitcoms. Yes, there were a number of excellent TV movies, but the creative drought for original series lasted for seven years.

    At least that was true until March 15, 1998. ''The Larry Sanders Show'' moved to Sundays for its sixth season and HBO ushered in a new creative era. ''Sex and the City,'' ''The Sopranos,'' ''Curb Your Enthusiasm'' and ''Six Feet Under'' all premiered on HBO in the next 3+ years.

    And this creative era peaked during the 2003-04 TV season when Sunday HBO series were nominated for 58 Emmy Awards. One network. One night. 58 nods. NBC holds the record with 97 Emmy nods for their series during the 1986-87 season. But NBC needed all seven nights. Not one.

    Even though ''Rome'' is not drawing as large an audience as HBO might like, it will likely draw a number of Emmy nods next year.

    Thursday, September 15, 2005

    Think Globally, Ad Locally

    Addressable advertising for TV.

    It "enables operators to generate incremental advertising revenue by providing advertisers with the ability to send tailored promotions to targeted groups of viewers." (Navic Networks) Here's a nice discussion of a field study from about a year ago. If you don't want to read anything else, think GoogleAds for TV with full commercials for the top five items instead of sidebar adverts.

    That's just the tip of the iceberg for those viewers who aren't afraid to share a little personal data. What if we extend this approach? Let's tie national ads targeted to you with local ads related to your buying behavior.

    Imagine that you see an ad for toilet paper. But not just any ad. It's an ad that's been specifically developed for your zip code and age group. And the ad is intriguing enough that you don't even change the channel. (One of the first objectives of addressable advertising is to make an ad interesting enough to you so that you don't change the channel. Because it is all about you, isn't it?)

    Halfway through the commercial--once you're past the point where viewers typically switch the channel, something else happens. Suddenly an ad for a local grocery store appears on the bottom (or far right) of the screen.

    Why? Your local grocery store has that brand of toilet paper on sale. Your frequent shopper card, which you swiped on your cable box at some time in the past, suggests that you haven't bought toilet paper from them in a while. Just push the '$' button on your remote to add toilet paper to your shopping list at the advertised price. Next time you go shopping, you'll swipe your shoppers club at the grocery store and the machine will print your complete shopping list with your price for each item.